It is a commonly-held view in modern times, even by scholars, that many
positive aspects of today's society are attributable to the Protestant
Reformation. They say that Protestantism "liberated" society from the
yoke of the Catholic Church, putting religion, learning, government and
labor into the hands of the common people. Further, they attribute the
Reformation as leading to modern science, democracy, liberal philosophy
and public education. Unfortunately, this is the propaganda so many
people are victimized with in public school, only to subsequently center
their worldview on these accusations against the Catholic Church. Even
many Catholics themselves fall into this, viewing the Church and its
Sacraments as mere symbols and congregational sentiments while giving
way to permissiveness and compliance towards Goodness and Truth.
In
truth, the Reformation stunted the intellectual, technological,
political and economic growth of Europe for centuries, especially with
the pillaging wreaked by Henry VIII in England by closing monasteries,
legalizing usury and separating from the Church. By the time of the
Renaissance, people in the Church - especially monks - had progressed
very far, having developed the university system, the scientific method,
the continuation of writing, and more, even discovering the technology
of casting iron which led to the Industrial Revolution centuries later.
The Reformation explicitly denied the vast range of Catholic learning,
especially its emphasis on philosophy, science, classical literature,
Latin and humanistic principles. More deeply, the Reformation denied
reason. To quote Martin Luther, "[reason] is the Devil's greatest
whore." (Martin Luther's Last Sermon in Wittenberg ... Second Sunday in
Epiphany, 17 January 1546.Dr. Martin Luthers Werke: Kritische
Gesamtausgabe. (Weimar: Herman Boehlaus Nachfolger, 1914), Band 51:126,
Line 7ff)
But the Reformation was not independent of its times.
It was a constituent development of the Renaissance, which heralded both
spectacular and horrible ideas for Western civilization. On the one
hand, Catholicism developed humanism, which emphasized human dignity as
being in the Image of God and applying that idea to all areas of life,
which lead to modern democracy, human rights, civil rights, etc. On the
other, fear of the Black Plague shifted people's focus from the heavenly
topics of Catholicism to concerns of the world. Society began to focus
on money, aesthetics, technology, nature and individualism. The
underlying philosophy that developed in the Renaissance, opposite
Catholic humanism, was materialism. This was the root of the Reformation
just as much as other Renaissance developments.
Many people
forget (or ignore) the fabric of materialism in Protestantism. By
emphasizing the purely literal and historical meaning of Scripture to
the exclusion of all else, denying fields such as philosophy and
literature, and citing Catholic Sacraments as superstitious and its
sacramentals as idolatrous, Protestants denied all meaning and
significance beyond the obvious physical world. Ironically, many
Protestants also hated the physical world, espousing a sort of Platonism
where only the spiritual world means anything and is absolutely
separate from the physical. In their confusion, Protestants believed
Catholic attribute spiritual significance and philosophical meaning to
life because we prefer the world over God. In truth, we do this because
the world was made by God, and thus has meaning, especially sanctified
by the Incarnation - whereas Protestant materialism simply distances God
and vilifies the world.
The Protestant rejection of reason, as
an expression of Renaissance materialism, has influenced the entire
world since. Before the Renaissance, society - especially scholars and
religious/clergy - viewed learned information as simply a tool for the
clarification of reason. The purpose of education in the Middle Ages was
the sharpening and honing of reason. To them, while some people are
ignorant and will always be, everyone has reason and can use it, so it
is truly an inherently human faculty that can uncover and interpret
Truth. At the advent of the Renaissance and its materialist forsaking of
reason, the focus in people's lives - especially in academic circles -
became acquiring as much information as possible. Knowledge, rather than
reason, became the measure of not only intelligence, but wisdom and
spiritual vision. Protestant ministers were not judged apt based on
their elucidative abilities, but on their memorization of Scripture.
Similarly, philosophy, logic and rhetoric took a back seat to the
memorization of historical, scientific, economic and mathematical
information with no pressure to care about one's subject. The study and
use of reason became not only marginalized but mocked and rebuked as
immature, irrelevant and primitive.
I believe this is one of the
most difficult fundamental obstacles Catholics often face in dialogue
with atheists and Protestants. Catholicism still employs reason. Even if
our people are usually rationally inhibited during materialistic public
school, many Catholics still attend Catholic school, especially if they
subsequently attend seminary or a Catholic college, or simply study it
themselves. For example, when addressing the question of the existence
of God, many Catholic apologists use the argument of First Cause - since
the universe exhibits cause and effect, there must rationally be a
first cause or first mover. To proceed the physical universe, this being
must be divine - God. When many atheists reject this off-hand,
Catholics often feel dismissed or mocked. Which they often are in this
situation. But atheists' minds, being so deeply ingrained with
materialistic, anti-reason thinking, automatically reject arguments that
employ reason. This is why they usually reply with "the physical world
does not give any conclusive evidence that there is or is not a First
Mover, and because God cannot be seen, He cannot be proven and thus does
not exist." Not only do they say the First Cause cannot be known, but
because their materialistic focus is so narrow and limited to the
visible world, they believe with certain faith that God does not exist
if He is not visible.
Reason was the primary tool I used in my
conversion to Catholicism. Obviously, reason is not the only thing that
did this. Being Catholic is not simply an intellectual pursuit. It is a
deeply spiritual life rooted in faith, love and hope, guided and focused
on God and His Church. Ultimately, these were the deciding factors in
my conversion. However, without reason, I would have remained an
atheist. Christ Himself used reason, as did the entire Bible. The
reasoning of the Church when interpreting dogma is infallible under
Papal authority. While apologetics should be gentle and reverent, reason
should never be forsaken, there or in the rest of one's life.
No comments:
Post a Comment